By Aaron Minsoo Kang ‘18, SSDP Philippines Earlier this month we announced the launch of the International Activities Fund, which will assist SSDP activists around the world who don’t have access to the same resources often used by young people in the United States. We exceeded our initial $10,000 goal and are now aiming to raise $20,000 to kickstart the fund. Today, we want to share a story from Aaron Minsoo Kang ‘18, a seventeen-year-old SSDP activist in the Philippines. President Rodrigo Duterte’s anti-drug campaign has threatened many lives in the Philippines and could now possibly impact children. As schools opened last month, the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) proposed to conduct drug testing on students as young as ten years old. This proposal would violate the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002, which authorizes drug testing only for secondary and tertiary level students. This demonstrates that the PDEA is willing to renege on the country’s laws as part of their solution to the drug problem. According to human rights groups, more than 20,000 extrajudicial killings have taken place as part of the Presidents anti-drug policies. Given the President’s public death threats against people who use drugs, children would now be more vulnerable in a dangerous environment. 
The Office of the President and the Department of Education has released statements rejecting the PDEA’s proposal. But both offices are in a bind as they scramble to turn down drug testing fourth-grade students while justifying the same punitive drug testing policies for high school students. Parents and youth leaders from opposition group Akbayan protested outside elementary schools across Metro Manila on July 5 to oppose the policy. They claim that children would be traumatized and afraid to attend school or participate in school activities because of the punitive drug policy. According to a Rappler report, one parent protesting in Quezon City said: “Parents know that when children are in school, they’re supposed to be safe, nothing bad will happen to them…my son himself said he’s scared to go to school.” Here’s why Filipinos are fighting back against plans to subject grade-schoolers to drug testing:
SSDP activists from the Philippines, Justine Balane ’17 and Shamah Bulangis ’17, speak about their work fighting the drug war at #SSDP2018.
- Drug testing will violate the children’s right to privacy. The Malacañang Palace and the Department of Education agree that random drug testing on minors violates their right to privacy. Confidential information about children could end up in the wrong hands especially after a significant number of drug-related killings came from controversial drug watch lists. According to Cathy Alvarez, Executive Director of StreetLawPH, carrying out random drug testing among 10-year-olds poses a “greater risk of stigmatization and discrimination.” Increasing stigma by branding people dependent on drugs as hopeless criminals denies them a chance to seek help and rehabilitate themselves, which is especially detrimental to a child’s future when they’re stigmatized in this way at a young age.
- Drug testing is a waste of resources. According to Secretary Leonor Briones of the Department of Education, the potential cost for carrying out the test at every school would be up to 2.8 billion pesos ($52,344,600 USD). This would be a significant increase from the annual budget for drug testing in 2017 of 40 million pesos ($747,780). It would be a waste of public money to drug test children instead of funding mental health services, clinics, and education.
- Drug tests will not deter drug misuse or discourage young people from using drugs. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), drug addiction has been defined as a “chronic, relapsing brain disease.” Drug testing only tells you when someone has used drugs, it does not prevent people from using them. Once a drug user tests positive, it is naive to believe that police will handle the situation in a safe manner because of all the unjust killings of drug users and death threats made toward them by the President. Instead, the community must promote more holistic and age-appropriate preventive measures for children such as sports, art, music, and theatre to deter them from becoming interested in trying drugs.
